Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah J Davies results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 1,459 hits . Analysis detected 6,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,147 of 6,628 authors). This Hannah J Davies is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Hannah J Davies
Author details
Total words: 3,716
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.7% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 39.3% 39.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 37.3% 37.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 37.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst