Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swalwell Scandal results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,647 hits . Analysis detected 13,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (16,023 of 37,536 keywords). This Swalwell Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Swalwell Scandal
Keyword details
Total words: 9,632
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst