Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Living results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 640 hits . Analysis detected 5,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (24,240 of 34,791 keywords). This Sustainable Living is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Sustainable Living
Keyword details
Total words: 6,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst