Keyword summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 697 hits . Analysis detected 5,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (20,837 of 34,481 keywords). This Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Keyword details
Total words: 6,268
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst