Keyword summary
7%3 analyzed articles/videos1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Cardinals results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 2,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,396 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,718 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Cardinals is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
St Louis Cardinals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
19%St Louis Cardinals (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,396
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510018.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate