Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Helena Ascension And Tristan Da Cunha results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 538 hits. Analysis detected 2,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,488 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (31,062 of 37,536 keywords). This St Helena Ascension And Tristan Da Cunha is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
St Helena Ascension And Tristan Da Cunha
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 6,488
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos