Keyword summary
62%4 analyzed articles/videos677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Southampton results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,732 hits. Analysis detected 14,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,919 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,487 of 37,536 keywords). This Southampton is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Southampton
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
49%Southampton (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,919
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.5%14.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate