Keyword summary
18%2 analyzed articles/videos2,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sewage Pollution results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 702 hits. Analysis detected 3,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,917 of 35,668 keywords). This Sewage Pollution is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Sewage Pollution
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
8%Sewage Pollution (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos