Keyword summary
49% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Election results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,566 hits . Analysis detected 16,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,198 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (28,719 of 35,718 keywords). This Senate Election is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Senate Election
Keyword details
Total words: 19,198
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst