Keyword summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Now results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 662 hits . Analysis detected 4,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,946 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (10,082 of 37,432 keywords). This Seattle Now is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Seattle Now
Keyword details
Total words: 2,946
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.5% 22.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst