Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seahawks results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hindsight Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 1,047 hits . Analysis detected 3,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,835 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,997 of 37,536 keywords). This Seahawks is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Seahawks
Keyword details
Total words: 2,835
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.7% percentile 4.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 36.9% 36.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 36.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst