Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scripps National Spelling Bee results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 4,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,352 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,540 of 37,536 keywords). This Scripps National Spelling Bee is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Scripps National Spelling Bee
Keyword details
Total words: 11,352
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst