Keyword summary
82% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientists results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,621 hits . Analysis detected 13,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,080 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,783 of 37,536 keywords). This Scientists is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Scientists
Keyword details
Total words: 13,080
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst