Keyword summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salad Greens results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 282 hits . Analysis detected 2,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,216 of 37,536 keywords). This Salad Greens is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Salad Greens
Keyword details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst