Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sacred Honor results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 2,457 hits. Analysis detected 11,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,726 of 37,533 keywords). This Sacred Honor is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Sacred Honor
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Sacred Honor (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,172
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
025507510010.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos