Keyword summary
70% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robinhood results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 711 hits . Analysis detected 5,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,878 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,637 of 34,833 keywords). This Robinhood is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Robinhood
Keyword details
Total words: 4,878
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst