Keyword summary
⁠8%3 analyzed articles/videos5,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reinforcement Learning results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 1,480 hits. Analysis detected 8,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,698 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (33,938 of 34,833 keywords). This Reinforcement Learning is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Reinforcement Learning
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠3%Reinforcement Learning (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,698
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos