Keyword summary
⁠7%2 analyzed articles/videos916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Redshift results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 2,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (22,797 of 37,536 keywords). This Redshift is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Redshift
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠40%Redshift (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,664
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos