Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raul Guillermo Rodriguez Castro results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,555 hits. Analysis detected 10,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,516 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (25,064 of 37,536 keywords). This Raul Guillermo Rodriguez Castro is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Raul Guillermo Rodriguez Castro
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 11,516
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.4%6.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos