Keyword summary
64% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racing results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 2,068 hits . Analysis detected 18,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,863 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (28,343 of 34,288 keywords). This Racing is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Racing
Keyword details
Total words: 20,863
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst