OutKick89%

Bubba Wallace triggers one of the biggest wrecks in NASCAR history, 'Dega lap dances & Cowboy Pillow girls! 82%

By Zach Dean87%

4/27/2026, 12:18:39 PM

Topics: Sports

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.4% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,649 of 20,179 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the article peer group.

What a week for NASCAR. 
I'm not sure if it's was good, bad, or indifferent, but it was ... something. 
It was certainly newsy. 
Certainly not boring. 
You can call the sport a lot of things after this past week. 
"Boring" ain't one of them. 
And, if you ask insufferable Stephen A. 
Smith, "sport" ain't one of them, either! 
We'll get into it. 
Carson Hocevar became another first-time Cup winner Sunday at Talladega. 
I can unequivocally say that Carson winning was good for NASCAR. 
Let's get that out of the way right off the bat. 
In a week where the sport experienced major turnover, and turned a major eye towards the future, it got a much-needed kick in the pants with a guy like Carson Hocevar winning. 
NASCAR has needed a face for a while now. 
Chase Elliott was supposed to be the guy, but that ship sailed a long time ago. 
Denny Hamlin doesn't have a lot of years left. 
Kyle Busch is very clearly past his prime. 
Bubba Wallace ... well, forget that. 
It ain't gonna be Bubba, although I would LOVE to see that fallout. 
I've banged on the Hocevar drum for a year now. 
Some kids just have it. 
Carson has it. 
We'll get into that, too. 
What else? 
I've got The Big One at Talladega, which I'm fairly certain deserves an even bigger name. 
That HAD to be up there in terms of biggest crashes in NASCAR history. 
I've never seen anything quite like it. 
I've also got Jim France stepping down, Steve O'Donnell stepping in and the greatest sponsor in NASCAR history  Cowboy Pillows  is BACK! 
What a moment. 
OK, four tires, enough fuel to get us to Texas, and maybe a couple more tow-trucks to help finish cleaning up yesterday's mess ... 
Monday Morning Pit-Stop  the 'Is There Anyone Even Left?' 
edition  is LIVE! 
Who do we blame here? 
Let's spin the wheel today and start with ... the chaos! 
It's the final Monday of April, after all. 
Let's end it with a bang. 
Look, these wrecks are a dime-a-dozen at places like Talladega and Daytona. 
I'm not here to hype up crashes. 
I've seen them all. 
I'm numb to most of them at this point. 
That being said, every once in a while, you get a pileup like what we got on Lap 115 yesterday at Talladega. 
One of those Big Ones that takes out half the field. 
One of those that goes viral because it's mesmerizing to watch unfold. 
"Parking lot" was the sexy word everyone used yesterday. 
The field "looked like a parking lot" after this one. 
That's what usually happens when the leaders wreck at Daytona and 'Dega. 
When you're going 180 mph and everyone in front of you starts spinning left and right, it's tough to miss. 
Here's the kicker ... everyone's favorite driver, Bubba Wallace, was the one who got the party started. 
Of course he was! 
Was it his fault? 
Well ... 
Rollllllllll tape! 
Joey Logano probably said it best 
So, the official count from NASCAR was 26. 
Twenty-six cars involved in that wreck, which puts it up there with one of the biggest ever. 
Two years ago, we had 28 cars wreck at 'Dega. 
At the time, folks called that the largest Cup crash ever. 
For those wondering, the 2002 Busch race at ... you guessed it, Talladega ... still holds the record for most cars involved with 31. 
So close! 
Maybe next time. 
Anyway, back to Bubba ... fans, obviously, jumped all over him after that. 
I get it. 
At first glance, it doesn't look great. 
How do you wreck from the lead? 
Did he just try to throw an unnecessary block with 80 laps still to go? 
Is he just an awful driver? 
That one, by the way, is the most popular opinion on the internet this morning: 
I could go on and on. 
Trust me. 
It's a WAR ZONE on NASCAR Twitter today. 
It's a bloodbath. 
Here's the part where I ... don't blame Bubba! 
I know. 
Please don't yell at me. 
Fair is fair, and I can't watch that  knowing how bad these Next Gen cars are  and still blame Bubba Wallace. 
I'm sorry. 
I know you're angry. 
Look, these cars stink. 
All the drivers hate them. 
All the fans hate them. 
They've made superspeedway racing unwatchable. 
You can't draft. 
You can't push. 
You can't bump. 
Hell, you can't really get good gas mileage. 
I'm just not sure what they're good at. 
KYLE LARSON'S ATTEMPT AT 'DOUBLE' COMES TO END AS HE WRECKS AT INDY 500 
That sort of hit should not have sent Bubba into the wall. 
Five years ago, it wouldn't have. 
But these cars are so squirrely, the driver really doesn't have much control anymore. 
Listen to Joey Logano. 
He's a two-time Cup champ. 
He knows how to win a restrictor-plate race. 
He's got absolutely no allegiance to Bubba Wallace, or to Toyota: 
"Round bumpers and unstable cars." 
There you go. 
That's the Next Gen car in a nutshell. 
That's a bad combination for places like Daytona and Talladega. 
It just doesn't work. 
It's why you see guys running around single-file for half the race now. 
The second they start racing, they start wrecking. 
It's pathetic. 
It's embarrassing. 
It's, frankly, killing the series. 
Ryan Blaney ... thoughts? 
Carson, Cowboys & NASCAR's future 
Yeah, I mean, I don't know what to do at this point, beyond tearing it all down and starting over. 
I doubt NASCAR is gonna do that given the investment they made in this car years ago. 
The good news is, I don't have to make those decisions ... 
Steve O'Donnell does! 
He's the new man in charge of NASCAR after Jim France announced Saturday he was stepping down as CEO. 
Was it a huge surprise? 
No. 
Jim's 81. 
Frankly, his position is far more ceremonial this point than anything. 
Steve O'Donnell and Ben Kennedy have been in charge for years now. 
With Steve Phelps thankfully removed earlier this year, this was the logical next step. 
Steve's in charge, Ben's his No. 2, and NASCAR should be off to the races! 
... right? 
I've heard that spiel from NASCAR for two decades now. 
It's why they went to places like the LA Coliseum and the Chicago streets. 
It's why they went to Mexico last year. 
It's why they're going to San Diego this year. 
MICHAEL JORDAN'S NASCAR DRIVER MAKES HISTORY WITH 3RD STRAIGHT WIN TO START 2026 SEASON 
Has it worked? 
I don't know. 
There's a reason they're all of a sudden resurrecting places like Rockingham and Chicagoland now, right? 
There's a reason they've gone back to North Wilkesboro the past few years. 
"Finding news fans" has been the sexy buzz term for a decade now. 
How about just finding the right fans? 
We ever thought about that? 
Maybe employ Carson Hocevar as your new spokesperson while you're at it! 
As I said 1,200 words ago ... this guy is what NASCAR needs. 
They need him to win again. 
And then again after that. 
And then a few more times after that. 
Let's inject some life back into the garage. 
Let's find someone with an ounce of personality. 
Carson Hocevar fits the bill. 
It was a good win to kick off the Steve O'Donnell era. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
OK, that's it for today. 
Solid Monday. 
Even better when you end it with Cowboy Pillows. 
THIS is how you sponsor a race at Talladega! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.3%Zach Dean: 3.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Zach Dean: 4.9%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.4%This article: 0.8%Zach Dean: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.8%This article: 2.6%Zach Dean: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 2.5%Zach Dean: 2.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias2.5%This article: 0.2%Zach Dean: 4.9%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect0.2%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Zach Dean: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 1.6%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect1.6%This article: 14.7%Zach Dean: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias14.7%This article: 5.2%Zach Dean: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.2%This article: 14.3%Zach Dean: 11.4%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias14.3%This article: 0.6%Zach Dean: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.6%This article: 2.6%Zach Dean: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error2.6%This article: 0.6%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.1%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Zach Dean: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.3%This article: 1.8%Zach Dean: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect1.8%This article: 4.7%Zach Dean: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Zach Dean: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.4%This article: 0.2%Zach Dean: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.2%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Zach Dean: 3.8%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem5.3%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.4%Zach Dean: 2.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority2.4%This article: 1.4%Zach Dean: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma1.4%This article: 1.2%Zach Dean: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope1.2%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%Zach Dean: 9.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.6%Zach Dean: 1.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon1.6%This article: 5.6%Zach Dean: 7.2%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.3%Zach Dean: 2.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.5%Zach Dean: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal1.5%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.6%Zach Dean: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.6%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.2%Zach Dean: 19.6%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice8.2%This article: 4.9%Zach Dean: 2.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination4.9%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Zach Dean: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.7%

1276 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker0.9%attributed speech1,265writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJoey Logano • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Joey Logano

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words100% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Joey Logano: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Joey Logano: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Joey Logano: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.