Keyword summary
92%6 analyzed articles/videos1,552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Scandal results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 2,120 hits. Analysis detected 14,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,001 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (12,252 of 34,557 keywords). This Political Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Political Scandal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
65%Political Scandal (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate