Keyword summary
45% 4 analyzed articles/videos 837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pixar results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,476 hits . Analysis detected 12,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,724 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,878 of 36,391 keywords). This Pixar is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Pixar
Keyword details
Total words: 11,724
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst