Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annabel Nugent results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 647 hits . Analysis detected 2,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,128 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,875 of 6,137 authors). This Annabel Nugent is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Annabel Nugent
Author details
Total words: 4,128
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.7% 15.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst