Keyword summary
39%4 analyzed articles/videos3,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoenix results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,140 hits. Analysis detected 11,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,927 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,048 of 37,055 keywords). This Phoenix is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Phoenix
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
25%Phoenix (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,927
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate