Keyword summary
67%6 analyzed articles/videos4,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pfas results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,930 hits. Analysis detected 19,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,060 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (22,066 of 37,536 keywords). This Pfas is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Pfas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%Pfas (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,060
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510041.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate