Keyword summary
21%3 analyzed articles/videos1,581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patriot Systems results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,001 hits. Analysis detected 6,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,136 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,547 of 36,521 keywords). This Patriot Systems is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Patriot Systems
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
41%Patriot Systems (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,136
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate