Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Panama Canal results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,065 hits . Analysis detected 5,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,724 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,303 of 37,536 keywords). This Panama Canal is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Panama Canal
Keyword details
Total words: 6,724
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst