Keyword summary
⁠77%5 analyzed articles/videos2,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olive Garden results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 2,318 hits. Analysis detected 20,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,349 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,322 of 37,536 keywords). This Olive Garden is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Olive Garden
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠44%Olive Garden (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos