Keyword summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oleksandr Syrskyi results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 850 hits . Analysis detected 7,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,513 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,179 of 37,530 keywords). This Oleksandr Syrskyi is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Oleksandr Syrskyi
Keyword details
Total words: 6,513
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst