Keyword summary
92%2 analyzed articles/videos1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oleksandr Syrskyi results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 850 hits. Analysis detected 7,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,513 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,179 of 37,530 keywords). This Oleksandr Syrskyi is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Oleksandr Syrskyi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Oleksandr Syrskyi (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,513
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.5%10.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate