Keyword summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Objectives results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,315 hits. Analysis detected 9,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,823 of 37,533 keywords). This Objectives is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Objectives
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
32%Objectives (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,636
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos