Author summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Ordein results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , False Dilemma , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 242 hits . Analysis detected 1,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,779 of 6,363 authors). This Pedro Ordein is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Pedro Ordein
Author details
Total words: 1,820
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.3% 9.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.3% 13.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst