Keyword summary
76% 12 analyzed articles/videos 8,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Power results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 3,273 hits . Analysis detected 32,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,013 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (31,028 of 35,661 keywords). This Nuclear Power is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Nuclear Power
Keyword details
Total words: 37,013
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles37K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst