Keyword summary
76% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Yankees results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,031 hits . Analysis detected 7,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,510 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (23,709 of 34,544 keywords). This New York Yankees is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. New York Yankees
Keyword details
Total words: 9,510
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst