Fox News89%

Yankees' Cam Schlittler accomplishes feat unseen for more than 100 years 28%

By Ryan Gaydos0%

5/10/2026, 4:25:27 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 287 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,750 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the article peer group.

New York Yankees pitcher Cam Schlittler is off to a hot start to the 2026 season. 
He allowed two hits over six innings, striking out six and held the Milwaukee Brewers scoreless during his outing. 
However, the Yankees fell to the Brewers, 4-3, in 10 innings. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
Still, Schlittler reached a feat not seen in more than 100 years. 
He reached at least 50 strikeouts on the year with fewer than 10 walks issued, no more than one home run allowed and an ERA less than 1.50 in his first nine starts of the year. 
He’s the first pitcher to hit those benchmarks since Walter Johnson did it in 1913, according to Opta Stats. 
Schlittler has 59 strikeouts, nine walks, one home run given up and an ERA of 1.35. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM 
“He’s a stud,” Yankees manager Aaron Boone said, via MLB.com. 
“He’s just a great competitor, and obviously a great pitcher. ... 
He settled in and obviously pitched awesome.” 
Schlittler also stayed in the game after getting drilled by a 108.5 mph liner in the first inning. 
The Brewers were down 2-0 when Schlittler exited the game. 
Milwaukee’s Jake Bauers cut the lead in half with home run off Brent Headrick. 
Camilo Doval allowed the tying run and Fernando Cruz allowed the final two runs. 
Brewers catcher William Contreras was 2-for-4 with two RBI in the win. 
His sacrifice fly in the 10th inning scored Luis Rengifo. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Milwaukee improved to 21-16 and New York fell to 26-14. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Ryan Gaydos: 7.3%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Ryan Gaydos: 11.0%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect16.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Ryan Gaydos: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.6%Ryan Gaydos: 3.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority6.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 5.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 7.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 4.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Ryan Gaydos: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.8%

287 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker9.8%attributed speech259writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageAaron Boone • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Aaron Boone

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words100% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.0 ptsWriter: 12.0%Aaron Boone: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.