Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Hockey League results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 974 hits . Analysis detected 10,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,823 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,164 of 37,536 keywords). This National Hockey League is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. National Hockey League
Keyword details
Total words: 9,823
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst