Keyword summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video179 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Historic Trails Interpretive Center results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Status Quo Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 133 faulty-reasoning hits from 537 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,597 of 37,536 keywords). This National Historic Trails Interpretive Center is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
National Historic Trails Interpretive Center
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 537
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles537 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos