Keyword summary
77%3 analyzed articles/videos860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 926 hits. Analysis detected 5,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,179 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,252 of 35,701 keywords). This Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
61%Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate