Keyword summary
77% 3 analyzed articles/videos 860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 926 hits . Analysis detected 5,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,179 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,252 of 35,701 keywords). This Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf
Keyword details
Total words: 5,179
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst