Keyword summary
66% 33 analyzed articles/videos 20,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minneapolis results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 12,727 hits . Analysis detected 112,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 117,626 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,408 of 37,536 keywords). This Minneapolis is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Minneapolis
Keyword details
Total words: 117,626
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score33 analyzed articles117.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst