Keyword summary
11% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mexico City results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 7,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,933 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,469 of 37,536 keywords). This Mexico City is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. Mexico City
Keyword details
Total words: 13,933
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst