AP News53%

Mexico City is sinking so quickly, it can be seen from space 5%

By MEGAN JANETSKY0%

5/1/2026, 1:11:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 737 faulty-reasoning hits from 599 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,994 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the article peer group.

MEXICO CITY (AP)  Mexico City is sinking by nearly 10 inches (about 25 centimeters) a year, according to new satellite imagery released this week by NASA, making it one of the world’s fastest-subsiding metropolises. 
One of the world’s most sprawling and populated urban areas, at 3,000 square miles (about 7,800 square kilometers) and some 22 million people, the Mexican capital and surrounding cities were built atop an ancient lake bed. 
Many downtown streets were once canals, a tradition that continues in the rural fringes. 
Extensive groundwater pumping and urban development have dramatically shrunk the aquifer, meaning that Mexico City has been sinking for more than a century, leaving many monuments and older buildings  like the Metropolitan Cathedral, where construction began in 1573  visibly tilted to the side. 
The contracting aquifer has also contributed to a chronic water crisis that is only expected to worsen. 
“It damages part of the critical infrastructure of Mexico City, such as the subway, the drainage system, the water, the potable water system, housing and streets,” said Enrique Cabral, a researcher studying geophysics at the National Autonomous University of Mexico. 
“It’s a very big problem.” 
Mexico City is sinking so fast that the subsidence can be spotted from space. 
In some parts it is happening at an average rate of 0.78 inches (2 centimeters) a month, according to NASA’s newly released report, such as at the main airport and the iconic monument commonly known as the Angel of Independence. 
Overall that means a yearly subsidence rate of about 9.5 inches (24 centimeters). 
Over the course of less than a century, the drop has been more than 39 feet (12 meters), according to Cabral. 
“We have one of the fastest velocities of land subsidence in the whole world,” he said. 
The NASA estimates are based on measurements taken between October 2025 and January 2026 by a powerful satellite known as NISAR, which can track real-time changes on the Earth’s surface and is a joint initiative between NASA and the Indian Space Research Organization. 
NISAR scientist Paul Rosen said that by capturing details of the Earth from space, the project is also “telling us something about what’s actually happening below the surface.” 
“It’s basically documentation of all of these changes within a city,” Rosen said. 
He added: “You can see the full magnitude of the problem.” 
With time the team hopes to be able to zoom in even more on specific areas and someday get measurements on a building-by-building basis. 
More broadly, researchers hope to apply the technology around the world to track things like natural disasters, changes in fault lines, the effects of climate change in regions like Antarctica and more. 
Rosen said it could be used to bolster alert systems, letting scientists alert governments to the need for evacuations in cases of volcano eruptions, for example. 
For Mexico City the technology amounts to a big advance in studying the subsidence issue and mitigating its worst effects, according to Cabral. 
For decades the government has largely ignored the problem other than stabilizing foundations under monuments like the cathedral. 
But following recent flare-ups of the water crisis, Cabral said, officials have begun to fund more research. 
Imagery from the NISAR satellite and the data that comes with it will be key for scientists and officials as they plan on how to address the problem. 
“To do long-term mitigation of the situation,” Cabral said, “the first step is to just understand.” 
___ 
Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 2.8%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias2.2%This article: 2.3%MEGAN JANETSKY: 3.3%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic2.3%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.4%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.1%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.1%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 2.7%MEGAN JANETSKY: 6.3%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.2%MEGAN JANETSKY: 3.4%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias13.2%This article: 2.8%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.5%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.8%This article: 19.5%MEGAN JANETSKY: 12.8%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias19.5%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.1%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.1%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.1%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.8%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.1%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias10.0%This article: 6.7%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 25.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 3.5%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority25.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.7%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%MEGAN JANETSKY: 4.7%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.8%MEGAN JANETSKY: 6.6%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.8%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.4%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.8%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.4%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.9%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 3.4%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.5%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.3%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.5%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground2.7%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.1%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.7%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 2.4%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.3%MEGAN JANETSKY: 6.4%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice2.3%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.1%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 1.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%MEGAN JANETSKY: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.8%

599 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers29%attributed speech427writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageEnrique Cabral • 40 words • 0.0% coverageEnrique Cabral • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEnrique Cabral • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Rosen • 28 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Rosen • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Rosen • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Rosen • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageEnrique Cabral • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageEnrique Cabral • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Enrique Cabral

57%flagged-word coverage
94 attributed words55% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Enrique Cabral: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Enrique Cabral: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.