Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Development results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,788 hits . Analysis detected 16,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,583 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (29,309 of 35,840 keywords). This Urban Development is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Urban Development
Keyword details
Total words: 19,583
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst