Keyword summary
10% 4 analyzed articles/videos 952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meta Ai results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 366 hits . Analysis detected 3,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,996 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (35,210 of 37,536 keywords). This Meta Ai is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Meta Ai
Keyword details
Total words: 7,996
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst