Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meryl Streep results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 2,064 hits . Analysis detected 12,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,128 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,518 of 37,536 keywords). This Meryl Streep is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Meryl Streep
Keyword details
Total words: 12,128
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst