Keyword summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Sanford results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 766 hits . Analysis detected 5,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,758 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,807 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Sanford is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Mark Sanford
Keyword details
Total words: 4,758
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst