Author summary
46% 1 analyzed article/video 736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Byrd results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 257 hits . Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,814 of 6,399 authors). This Caitlin Byrd is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Caitlin Byrd
Author details
Total words: 2,208
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst