Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark-Levine results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 1,624 hits . Analysis detected 5,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,626 of 37,369 keywords). This Mark-Levine is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Mark-Levine
Keyword details
Total words: 3,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.6% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 51.3% 51.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 51.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst