Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Cantwell results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 690 hits. Analysis detected 5,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,948 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,844 of 37,374 keywords). This Maria Cantwell is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Maria Cantwell
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
37%Maria Cantwell (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos