Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manila results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 2,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,083 of 34,833 keywords). This Manila is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Manila
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
51%Manila (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos