Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manila results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 789 hits . Analysis detected 2,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,083 of 34,833 keywords). This Manila is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Manila
Keyword details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst