Keyword summary
12% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malaria results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 681 hits . Analysis detected 7,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,168 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,497 of 36,204 keywords). This Malaria is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Malaria
Keyword details
Total words: 11,168
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst